There are 0 results search for keyword "is it better for the environment to be buried or cremated"
Jul 9, 2019 The Resomator, its supporters say, is badly needed by a burial and cremation industry that is increasingly damaging to the environment.
www.theguardian.comNov 5, 2019 But while it's true that cremation is less harmful than pumping a body full of formaldehyde and burying it on top of concrete,...
www.nationalgeographic.comCremation uses far fewer resources than almost any other disposition option but it does have an environmental impact. Cremation requires the burning of...
www.agreenerfuneral.orgMar 12, 2021 While cremations generate more carbon emissions than burials at the time of interment, their long-term impact is around 10% less than that of...
bare.com.auEven comparing the carbon footprint of cremation against burial is difficult – initially cremation is perhaps five times more polluting, but the long-term...
scattering-ashes.co.ukJan 15, 2018 Although cremation is more eco-friendly than burial, cremations burn much natural gas (a temperature of to 750 to 800 degrees must be maintained...
www.irishtimes.comOct 30, 2014 Standard burial and cremation take tons of energy and resources. ... As people become increasingly concerned with the environment,...
www.theatlantic.comDec 12, 2019 The unfortunate truth of the matter is that both options have some negative side effects. Cremation requires a lot of natural gas and produces a...
sussexwillowcoffins.co.ukJul 2, 2018 It takes 285kWh of gas and 15kWh of electricity to cremate a single person. The CO2 this generates is roughly the same as an 800km car...
www.sciencefocus.com